At this
point in my life, nothing about learning surprises me because I am always open
to learning opportunities.
However, what I found most striking was the many learning theories presented
throughout this course. I have
been in the field of instructional design, as an instructor for 5 years and as
a writer for just little over a year, and I knew about Skinner operant
condition (Ormrod, Schunk, & Gredler, 2009, p. 147) and Maslow hierarchy of
needs (p. 230), but it was
extremely interesting learning the different philosophies and theories on how
people learn. My personal favorite
is Howard Garner’s (2009) take on the multiple intelligence theory (as cited by
Armstrong, p. 6-7), as he was able to “dumb it down” in terms in which every
non-scholar can understand.
As with
anything in life, understanding the theory behind what we do can assist us in
closing the gap between where we are in our learning and where we want to be,
also known as the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) (Ormrod, Schunk, &
Gredler, 2009, p. 192-193). Along
with understanding the ZPD, I was introduced and/or reintroduced to learning
concepts that will be beneficial to how learn, retain and recall information
more effectively, such as elaboration (relating information to something
already known) and maintenance rehearsal (repeating information over and over)
(p. 71).
The
connection I have learned between learning theories, learning styles,
educational technology and motivation is that theories tell us of why, styles
describes how, technology focus on additional methods, and motivation is the
catalyst behind it all. We cannot
truly understand the how without the why and we cannot reach our full potential
without using additional resources, but in the end, if we do not have
motivation (the internal state
that arouses us to action) (p. 224), then it all will be for naught.
It goes
without saying that I having a deeper understanding of the theories behind the
reasons why people learn will without doubt aid me in being a better
instructional designer. The day
after I posted my week 8 discussion response, I was able to use information covered
in week 8: Motivational Factor in
the Online Classroom. I was
extremely proud that I was able to use some of what I have learned over the
duration of the course because it solidifies how I learn, as stated in my week 1 discussion: being
able to apply the information that I learn. I look forward to other
opportunities where I am able to apply the information I have learned so far in
this degree program as well as what I will learn in future courses. My
attention has been aroused; I am able to see the relevance, which heighten my
confidence, thus leading to a sense of satisfaction. This is what Huett et al (2008) refers to as ARCS as it
applies to motivation, but without the distant education.
References
Armstrong,
T. (2000). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (2nd ed ).
Alexandria,
VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Huett, J., Kalinowski, K., Moller, L.,
& Huett, K. (2008). Improving the motivation and retention
of
online students through the use of ARCS-based E-mails. American Journal of
Distance Education, 22(3), 159–176.
Ormrod, J., Schunk, D., & Gredler,
M. (2009). Learning theories and instruction (Laureate
custom edition). New York: Pearson.
custom edition). New York: Pearson.